2009 Audi TT vs. 1981 Datsun 280
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (201 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Datsun 280 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 1981 Datsun 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Datsun 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1981 Datsun 280 | |
| Make | Audi | Datsun |
| Model | TT | 280 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2530 mm |
