2009 Audi TT vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda 929 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |