2009 Audi TT vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Celeste |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |