2009 Audi TT vs. 1981 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,188 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1981 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3188 cc | 1480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2430 mm |