2009 Audi TT vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Audi | Plymouth |
Model | TT | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |