2009 Audi TT vs. 1982 Subaru Rex
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1982 Subaru Rex. (36 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Subaru Rex. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Subaru Rex. (54 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1982 Subaru Rex | |
| Make | Audi | Subaru |
| Model | TT | Rex |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 54 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2260 mm |
