2009 Audi TT vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 565 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | TT | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2160 mm |
