2009 Audi TT vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,188 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 360 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | TT | CJ |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3188 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2380 mm |
