2009 Audi TT vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Cougar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |