2009 Audi TT vs. 1986 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,087 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac DeVille. (129 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 610 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Cadillac DeVille. (271 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Cadillac DeVille.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1986 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | DeVille |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4087 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2820 mm |