2009 Audi TT vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | TT | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 36 L |
