2009 Audi TT vs. 1992 Ford Probe
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Probe would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 93 kg more than 1992 Ford Probe.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Probe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1992 Ford Probe | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Probe |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1277 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |
