2009 Audi TT vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 464 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 218 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 90 L |