2009 Audi TT vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 124 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | Midge |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1019 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |