2009 Audi TT vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |