2009 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 77 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | Midge |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
