2009 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 854 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.

Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MPV. (277 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MPV.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi TT 1996 Mazda MPV
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT MPV
Year Released 2009 1996
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3189 cc 2498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 277 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 936 kg 1790 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2850 mm