2009 Audi TT vs. 1998 BMW M

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW M would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW M (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW M weights approximately 420 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 BMW M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW M (340 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1998 BMW M has manual transmission. 1998 BMW M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi TT 1998 BMW M
Make Audi BMW
Model TT M
Year Released 2009 1998
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3189 cc 3246 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 328 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 7400 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 11.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4030 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 51 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]