2009 Audi TT vs. 1998 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XK weights approximately 634 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT. 1998 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi TT 1998 Jaguar XK
Make Audi Jaguar
Model TT XK
Year Released 2009 1998
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3189 cc 3995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.9 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 10.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 936 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 3040 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.4 L/100km 9.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]