2009 Audi TT vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 619 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Audi | Rover |
| Model | TT | Mini |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
