2009 Audi TT vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 570 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | SSU |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |