2009 Audi TT vs. 2001 Ford Urban Explorer
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Urban Explorer would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Urban Explorer weights approximately 399 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer (380 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2001 Ford Urban Explorer | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Urban Explorer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 380 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |