2009 Audi TT vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 366 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | XR 8 Xplod |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |