2009 Audi TT vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 450 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | CU-X |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |