2009 Audi TT vs. 2001 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 275 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2001 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2001 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
