2009 Audi TT vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ8
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ8 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (201 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 685 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2002 Jaguar XJ8 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XJ8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 16.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 85 L |