2009 Audi TT vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK8 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 804 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XK8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XK8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XK8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3188 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 75 L |