2009 Audi TT vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP) has 180 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 196 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi TT 2002 MCC Crossblade
Make Audi MCC
Model TT Crossblade
Year Released 2009 2002
Engine Size 3189 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 250 HP 70 HP
Torque 320 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 936 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 1810 mm