2009 Audi TT vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Audi | Samsung |
| Model | TT | SM3 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |
