2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 BMW X Activity
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X Activity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X Activity would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X Activity is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 BMW X Activity. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X Activity. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X Activity weights approximately 700 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X Activity. (300 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X Activity.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2003 BMW X Activity | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | X Activity |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 89.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 63 L |