2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 615 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 293 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 85 L |