2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (148 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 375 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster. 2003 Mazda Roadster has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 48 L |