2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 600 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Tribute. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi TT 2003 Mazda Tribute
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT Tribute
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.5 mm 84.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.8 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 895 kg 1495 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 9.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 57 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]