2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,188 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 246 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2003 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3188 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1176 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
