2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Audi | Subaru |
| Model | TT | R2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 56 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 66.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |
