2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Toyota Condor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (196 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | TT | Condor |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |