2009 Audi TT vs. 2003 Vector M12
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Vector M12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2003 Vector M12 | |
| Make | Audi | Vector |
| Model | TT | M12 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 5707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 484 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 576 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
