2009 Audi TT vs. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 314 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Blazer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 71 L |