2009 Audi TT vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |
