2009 Audi TT vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (285 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1167 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 117 L |