2009 Audi TT vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (268 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Sierra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 488 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 98 L |