2009 Audi TT vs. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 515 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | TT | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |