2009 Audi TT vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 250 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 773 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | TT | 300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3516 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3190 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |