2009 Audi TT vs. 2006 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (168 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2006 Chrysler Voyager | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | TT | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |
