2009 Audi TT vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 95 L |