2009 Audi TT vs. 2006 Pontiac SV 6
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Pontiac SV 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Pontiac SV 6 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Pontiac SV 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Pontiac SV 6. (289 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Pontiac SV 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2006 Pontiac SV 6 | |
Make | Audi | Pontiac |
Model | TT | SV 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 289 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 95 L |