2009 Audi TT vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | TT | Stavic |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |