2009 Audi TT vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi TT 2007 Mazda CX-9
Make Audi Mazda
Model TT CX-9
Year Released 2009 2007
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.1 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 76 L