2009 Audi TT vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 775 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Audi | Isuzu |
| Model | TT | KB |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3165 cc |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1670 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 17.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
