2009 Audi TT vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 796 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 710 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Audi | Koenigsegg |
Model | TT | CCXR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |